There’s been a lot, and I
mean loads, of talk about the This Girl Can campaign that’s been launched
recently. The aim of the campaign is to “inspire women to wiggle, jiggle, move
and prove that judgement is a barrier that can be overcome.” It’s also a “celebration
of active women up and down the country who are doing their thing no matter how
well they do it, how they look or even how red their face gets.”
Lots of my fellow, female,
fitness fanatic friends have been quick to shout about how great this is, to
tweet, blog and generally be all enthused. My own reaction has been positive too. It
seemed as though finally there was a campaign focused on a positive body image
and self-esteem, un-related to a specific company (such as Dove) with something
behind it to actually help and encourage women to get active. I enjoyed the
video and seeing it sparking so many conversations. So much better than all the
health and fitness magazines that appear to be positive on the face of it but
quite often are just perpetuating the negatives with all the “banish belly-fat”
and “get a six-pack” headlines, accompanied by pictures of slinky women or
ripped men.
But I’ve also had an
interesting conversation with a particular friend about the campaign.
The opening gambit was
that if men had started the campaign, it would have been classed as sexist and
tarred with the #everydaysexism brush. A number of other questions were raised
in our discussion. With so many more active men in the UK than women is it
really all about body image and self-confidence? How much of it comes down to
upbringing, choice or resources? Should there be a similar campaign aimed at
men? There’s a bias towards women in group activities and a bias towards men in
team sports so should we be addressing that instead? There was a feeling that
it was too focussed on gender, rather than body image as a whole. Should we be
aiming for greater equality overall?
A lot of food for thought
and some very interesting questions. Before I go any further let's be clear that I am *for* the campaign but it's never a bad thing to have some discussion.
My first thought was that
if women felt comfortable and confident enough to go out and get involved with
sports and exercise then would these campaigns exist at all? Probably not, so
it is addressing a real and particular issue. I think it's *incredibly* hard to
untangle body image and gender issues but this *is* a campaign about getting
*women* active and it seems to be sparking the right sorts of conversations. I
completely accept that men also experience issues with body image and being
judged. I’ve had conversations with men about how they too feel intimidated in
the gym, even when they go with a friend. Maybe there should be a similar
campaign for men. Are men moved by these sorts of campaigns in the same way
that women are though? Possibly not. Almost certainly not using similar
language. “This Boy Can”?
When it comes to getting
women active specifically I do think that certainly a significant barrier is body
image and self-confidence. The campaign is a good start but ideally this is an
issue that needs to be addressed from many angles. Health, fitness and
lifestyle magazines are a part of that. Their content is driven, to a certain
extent, by demand so maybe it won’t be until we follow up our words with
actions and stop consuming these magazines that we will change how the body is portrayed
in the media. Perhaps then little by little we can change society’s attitudes
and illusions.
Alongside the issue of
body image there are many other things that contribute to someone being less
active. Choice, facilities, upbringing. I have no data to back this up but I’m
fairly sure that most women don't have the same experiences of sport in their
youth as men do and that has an impact. It’s still the norm that women are the primary
child-raisers in society and as such find barriers to exercise like childcare
to be more difficult to overcome. Of course a large number of "inactive"
women may well choose not to do anything but there will be a large number who
can't because of lack of childcare facilities, finances and so on.
When it comes to gyms,
classes and swimming, women certainly have more options available to them in
terms of gender-specific sessions and there more women-focussed team sports
opportunities these days too. But how much does this help? If we think about getting the population as a
whole more active would men-only swim sessions and classes be of benefit? Positive
discrimination is still discrimination at the end of the day but is it
something we have to endure in the short term to achieve equality?
I don’t claim to have any
answers or real conclusions; ultimately anything that provokes discussion and
debate is useful. My final thought on this though is, as with so many things, why
can't we all just be kind and helpful to each other? Then none of this would be
relevant.
Yes, please let's start with burning all women's magazines. They are so terrible for women's self esteem that I could rage on and on and on about this for hours!
ReplyDelete